<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pride and Prejudice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/pride-and-prejudice/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/pride-and-prejudice</link>
	<description>Official blog of KL Going, author of young adult fiction.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 12:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Katz</title>
		<link>http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/pride-and-prejudice/comment-page-1#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Katz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/?p=162#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Hi!  My friend Georgia showed me your post - I think you're referring to my analysis of Robin Sloan's "Last Beautiful."  http://www.morelightmorelight.com/2010/03/29/noticeability/

You can use the code I posted there to do a similar analysis for any story - is there a story of yours that you'd like to try?

As to your overall point - I think it's always true.  The rules are always merely guidelines, and if you've got a good reason you should break them rather than be constrained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!  My friend Georgia showed me your post - I think you&#8217;re referring to my analysis of Robin Sloan&#8217;s &#8220;Last Beautiful.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.morelightmorelight.com/2010/03/29/noticeability/" rel="nofollow">http://www.morelightmorelight.com/2010/03/29/noticeability/</a></p>
<p>You can use the code I posted there to do a similar analysis for any story - is there a story of yours that you&#8217;d like to try?</p>
<p>As to your overall point - I think it&#8217;s always true.  The rules are always merely guidelines, and if you&#8217;ve got a good reason you should break them rather than be constrained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/pride-and-prejudice/comment-page-1#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/?p=162#comment-400</guid>
		<description>This is why I mostly read books from "verbose" authors. Often this turns out to be a select group of writers either from the past or from Britain, who are not afraid to use complicted phrases and words of more than 2 syllables. 

An interesting development that evolved from the Harry Potter series is that young readers began to demand more "grown up" writing. I worked in a bookstore during the long wait between the third and fourth book of the series. The children who were 9 and above were disgusted with the books aimed for their presumed reading ability. They were insulted by the simple language and began to read science fiction from the adult department. 

Side note: some American publishers have actual lists of "age appropriate" words that can be used in writing for specific grades. Needless to say, these are the simplest words possible. British writers and publishers appear to have a higher opinion of children's ability to learn how to read at a higher level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I mostly read books from &#8220;verbose&#8221; authors. Often this turns out to be a select group of writers either from the past or from Britain, who are not afraid to use complicted phrases and words of more than 2 syllables. </p>
<p>An interesting development that evolved from the Harry Potter series is that young readers began to demand more &#8220;grown up&#8221; writing. I worked in a bookstore during the long wait between the third and fourth book of the series. The children who were 9 and above were disgusted with the books aimed for their presumed reading ability. They were insulted by the simple language and began to read science fiction from the adult department. </p>
<p>Side note: some American publishers have actual lists of &#8220;age appropriate&#8221; words that can be used in writing for specific grades. Needless to say, these are the simplest words possible. British writers and publishers appear to have a higher opinion of children&#8217;s ability to learn how to read at a higher level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgia</title>
		<link>http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/pride-and-prejudice/comment-page-1#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 22:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/?p=162#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia</title>
		<link>http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/pride-and-prejudice/comment-page-1#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klgoing.com/kl_blog/?p=162#comment-393</guid>
		<description>When I was nursing my youngest, I read through all the Jane Austen books, starting with P&#38;P. I had also watched the A&#38;E version while pregnant, so it seemed natural. I first read P&#38;P when I was about 25, and it has never lost its appeal. Either has the phrase "violently in love"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was nursing my youngest, I read through all the Jane Austen books, starting with P&amp;P. I had also watched the A&amp;E version while pregnant, so it seemed natural. I first read P&amp;P when I was about 25, and it has never lost its appeal. Either has the phrase &#8220;violently in love&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

